Tweet: How domain experts react to technology ?

 

The above article analyzes the job skill outlook report by World Economic Forum named “The Future of Jobs Report 2018” .

My tweet include two things.

The predictions done by various experts and the reaction from domain experts are both problematic because of the complex nature of modern problems.

 
He collected 82,000 forecasts against real-world outcomes from nearly 300 academics, economists, policymakers and journalists.
 
 
In his seminal 2006 book Expert Political Judgment he presented crucial findings of this study.
 
Tetlock asked a group of pundits and foreign affairs experts to predict geopolitical events, like whether the Soviet Union would disintegrate by 1993.
 
Overall, the “experts” struggled to perform better than “dart-throwing chimps”, and were consistently less accurate than even relatively simple statistical algorithms.
 
This was true of liberals and conservatives, and regardless of professional credentials.
 
However, Tetlock found one particular type of thinking that produced much better prediction.
 
The experts who considered multiple explanations and balance them(average) together before making a prediction functioned better than those who relied on a single perspective.
 
Tetlock called the first group foxes( Multiple perspectives) and,
 
the second group hedgehogs( single perspective)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s